November 25, 2017

Federal Mortgage Assistance Programs Modified to Include Bankruptcy Debtors

Every week I receive several phone calls from homeowners who want to take advantage of the federal HAMP (Home Affordable Mortgage Program) but do not know where to start.  Often these callers are behind two or three months and are receiving foreclosure notices, but they really do not want to file Chapter 13 before exhausting all non-bankruptcy alternatives.

These homeowners may have received foreclosure notices that suggest that the mortgage lender intends to negotiate or modify their mortgage.   Georgia law now provides that all foreclosure notices must include a “negotiation provision.”   O.C.G.A. Section 44-14-162.2 provides:

Notice of the initiation of proceedings to exercise a power of sale in a mortgage, security deed, or other lien contract shall be given to the debtor by the secured creditor no later than 30 days before the date of the proposed foreclosure. Such notice shall be in writing, shall include the name, address, and telephone number of the individual or entity who shall have full authority to negotiate, amend, and modify all terms of the mortgage with the debtor, and shall be sent by registered or certified mail or statutory overnight delivery, return receipt requested, to the property address or to such other address as the debtor may designate by written notice to the secured creditor.

However, in real life, very few of these homeowners have had much success in reaching a deal with their lenders.

What about the highly touted HAMP program?   A quick search on the Internet reveals dozens of articles suggesting that, to date, HAMP is not working.

Now comes word that the federal government has modified HAMP to include homeowners in bankruptcy with new guidelines effective on June 1.   Supplemental directive 10-02 specifically addresses the applicability of HAMP to homeowners in bankruptcy. [Read more…]

Loan Modification Myths Busted

Can you modify your mortgage loan to reduce your principal balance? your interest rate?  other terms of your mortgage?  Over the past few months, I have heard a lot about mortgage modifications but very few details have emerged and I know of no one who has actually and successfully modified his mortgage.

I may be on the right track in obtaining more information.  One of my new colleagues at Solo Practice University (where I teach a class about creating a Social Security disability practice) is an attorney in New York who has actually represented clients and has obtained mortgage modifications.  She will be teaching a class about real estate law at SPU and I hope to be able to pick her brain about mortgage modifications.

In the meantime, here is a link to a recent blog post that Stefanie wrote entitled The Top 5 Loan Modification Myths.   I hope that more solid information from legitimate professionals who understand mortgage modification becomes available so I can bring it to you in the pages of this bankruptcy blog.

Are Mortgage Modifications in Bankruptcy a Good Idea – Part Two

Earlier this month, I wrote a post on this blog setting out the question of whether Congress should enact legislation empowering bankruptcy judges to modify the terms of mortgages within a Chapter 13 bankruptcy.

Several of my colleagues in the Bankruptcy Law Network have argued that adding this power to the authority of bankruptcy judges will help stem the foreclosure crisis we are seeing in many cities and towns and that so called “voluntary” mortgage modification programs created by mortgage lenders has not and will not work.

Bankruptcy Law Network founding member Cathy Moran, who I respect greatly, has created a special advocacy page on her website that you can use to encourage your elected representatives to support mortgage modification in bankruptcy.  At  the same time Cathy notes that the judicial mortgage modification legislation now circulating in Congress leaves many unanswered questions.

North Carolina bankruptcy attorney Adrian Lapas, writing on the Bankruptcy Law Network blog, makes a compelling case in favor of judicial mortgage modification – click on the link to read Adrian’s post.

What, then, are the arguments against judicial mortgage modification.   A thoughtful and well reasoned argument against modification comes from Andrew Grossman of the Heritage Foundation.   Mr. Grossman argues that judicial mortgage modification will impose uncertainty and financial loss on mortgage lenders, thereby increasing the cost of mortgage loans in the open market.   Credit, therefore, would further tighten, causing additional limits on mortgage availability. [Read more…]

Page optimized by WP Minify WordPress Plugin